The Fordham Urban Law Journal is proud to present “City Square,” the Journal‘s online companion. City Square is a competitive and lively arena showcasing meaningful discourse between the nation’s top legal scholars. City Square features five literary discussions at a time and is regularly updated with new content. Enjoy the literary discussions as they unfold and stay tuned! City Square Responses and Replies are permanently published on urbanlawjournal.com. We also hope to make City Square available on Westlaw, LexisNexis, and HeinOnline soon.
Editor-in-Chief: Jenna Lowy
Managing Editor: Sean Jaime
Business Editor: Shai Vander
Online Managing Editor: Henry Parr
Senior Articles Editor: Michael D’Ambrosio
Writing and Research Editor: Rodrigo Bacus
Cooper-Walsh Editor: Nicolette Ursini
Symposium Editor: Moshe Peters
Notes and Articles Editor: Hunter Brook
Notes and Articles Editor: Mary Dolan
Notes and Articles Editor: Carlos Ugalde
Notes and Articles Editor: William Brophy
Notes and Articles Editor: Colleen Powers
Notes and Articles Editor: Heather Zimmer
Notes and Articles Editor: Natasa Siveski
Associate Editor: Yehuda Alpert
Associate Editor: David Isakov
Associate Editor: Zachary Levovitz
Associate Editor: Jared Gans
Associate Editor: John Loubriel
Tom R. Tyler* & Jeffrey A. Fagan**Φ
This is a moment for the reconsideration of policing in America. In that effort we should examine the successes and failures of policing over the last several decades. We should also ask what works and what does not work in policing today. And, perhaps most importantly we need to explore what policing should be about in the 21st century.
By Claire Glass
In its 2012 ruling in Miller v. Alabama, the Supreme Court of the United States found mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles violate the 8th Amendment, unfairly subjecting juveniles to the same sentences as their adult counterparts without giving judges an opportunity to consider the defendant’s age and individual circumstances as mitigating factors. The landmark decision left unanswered, however, whether it would apply to the 2,500 some incarcerated people around the country already serving these unconstitutional sentences, and if so, what process should be employed for re-sentencing. (more…)
The Urban Law Journal, in partnership with the Feerick Center for Social Justice, will select a Fordham Law student for the George J. McMahon Fellowship. Eligible students include rising 2Ls or 3Ls working in public interest or government organizations, preferably outside of New York for the summer. The student will produce a written work on issues related to his or her research and work for the organization. The Fellowship provides a $5,000 stipend, and the recipient will work with next year’s ULJ editors to prepare the paper for publication in the ULJ.
Please view more information by clicking on the “Fellowships and Other Funding” link in the drop-down menu “About the Journal” above.
Deadline to submit an application: Monday, March 16, 2015 at 5:00 PM.
One of the frequently criticized aspects of American mass incarceration, privatized incarceration, is frequently considered worse, by definition, than public incarceration for both philosophical-ethical reasons and because its for-profit structure creates a disincentive to invest in improving prison conditions. Relying on literature about the neoliberal state and on insights from public choice economics, this Article sets out to challenge the distinction between public and private incarceration, making two main arguments: piecemeal privatization of functions, utilities, and services within state prisons make them operate more like private facilities, and public actors respond to the cost/benefit pressures of the market just like private ones. (more…)