The Fordham Urban Law Journal is proud to present “City Square,” the Journal‘s online companion. City Square is a competitive and lively arena showcasing meaningful discourse between the nation’s top legal scholars. City Square features five literary discussions at a time and is regularly updated with new content. Enjoy the literary discussions as they unfold and stay tuned! City Square Responses and Replies are permanently published on urbanlawjournal.com. We also hope to make City Square available on Westlaw, LexisNexis, and HeinOnline soon.
Editor-in-Chief: Chris Fennell
Managing Editor: Natasa Siveski
Business Editor: Jessica Baker
Senior Articles Editor: Gilana Keller
Online Managing Editor: Claire Glass
Writing and Research Editor: Naomi Babu
Cooper-Walsh Editor: Susan Moskovits
Symposium Editor: Kate Ross
Notes and Articles Editor: Theodore Becker
Notes and Articles Editor: Katie Campbell
Notes and Articles Editor: Lucy Gubernick
Notes and Articles Editor: Julie Hendrickson
Notes and Articles Editor: Winhkong Hua
Notes and Articles Editor: Samantha Indelicato
Notes and Articles Editor: Sara Johnson
Associate Editor: Adam Natan
Associate Editor: Herbert Rosen
Associate Editor: Kaitlyn Walsh
By Professor Andrea McArdle
Under the mayoral administration of Bill de Blasio, New York City has embarked on an ambitious affordable housing initiative mandating that real estate developers include below-market-rate units in rezoned areas of the city. Although approved by the New York City Council, the policy faces continuing community opposition, the expiration of a state tax subsidy law that would have attracted developers to participate in the plan, and likely complications as a result of a lawsuit filed last year challenging a community preference provision the City enforces with its affordable housing projects. This series of developments presents a number of challenges to realizing the City’s affordable housing goals.
By Shaun Prunotto
American television audiences have long enjoyed “reality” programs that grant unfiltered access to emergency personnel at work. Police actions are frequently documented and broadcast by programs such as A&E’s Live PD and Cops, which recently aired its 1,000th episode. Production companies, including ABC News (“ABC”) and Discovery, expanded the genre by embedding camera crews in some of the nation’s busiest emergency rooms and trauma units. Mark Chanko’s death in 2011, however, at New York-Presbyterian Hospital (“NYP”) and its subsequent broadcast on ABC’s NY Med has resulted in proposed legislation, a $2.2 million settlement between a federal agency and NYP for violations of the federal HIPAA Privacy Rule, and an ongoing legal battle in New York’s state courts. While the effect this backlash will have on the genre’s overall feasibility is still unknown, the genre’s filming practices within New York are changing dramatically.
The Urban Law Journal, in partnership with the Feerick Center for Social Justice, will select a Fordham Law student for the George J. McMahon Fellowship. Eligible students include rising 2Ls or 3Ls working in public interest or government organizations, preferably outside of New York for the summer. The student will produce a written work on issues related to his or her research and work for the organization. The Fellowship provides a $5,000 stipend, and the recipient will work with next year’s ULJ editors to prepare the paper for publication in the ULJ.
Please view more information by clicking on the “Fellowships and Other Funding” link in the drop-down menu “About the Journal” above.
Deadline to submit an application: Monday, March 16, 2015 at 5:00 PM.
One of the frequently criticized aspects of American mass incarceration, privatized incarceration, is frequently considered worse, by definition, than public incarceration for both philosophical-ethical reasons and because its for-profit structure creates a disincentive to invest in improving prison conditions. Relying on literature about the neoliberal state and on insights from public choice economics, this Article sets out to challenge the distinction between public and private incarceration, making two main arguments: piecemeal privatization of functions, utilities, and services within state prisons make them operate more like private facilities, and public actors respond to the cost/benefit pressures of the market just like private ones. (more…)